Jump to content

2018 BOA San Antonio?


Recommended Posts

I wonder if the score cut to make SA Finals will be like 2017 or revert back to normal levels. I'm leaning towards the score to make finals will be a 88 at least though.

Considering it's a state year for most groups and the rain I definitely think it will be lower. The competition will be just as fierce though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Considering it's a state year for most groups and the rain I definitely think it will be lower. The competition will be just as fierce though.

Based off of the early season regional scores we are on track for another very high scoring SA super. The reagan, vandy, Bowie scores from Conroe this year match up almost perfectly with the reagan, vandy, leander scores from Conroe last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based off of the early season regional scores we are on track for another very high scoring SA super. The reagan, vandy, Bowie scores from Conroe this year match up almost perfectly with the reagan, vandy, leander scores from Conroe last year.

True, and the dfw ones were similar too. This super regional was super competitive before, but now it's an absolute monster. There will be national finalist level bands who won't make finals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, and the dfw ones were similar too. This super regional was super competitive before, but now it's an absolute monster. There will be national finalist level bands who won't make finals.

it will be interesting to see - I think that the entry scores for finals may remain elevated, but in a UIL year, I do not see the 96.625 top score being broken this year - but we will know more in a few days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me personally there isn't "that one show" that is so good I expect a record to be broken. Honestly it makes it more fun because there are 4 or 5 bands I could see take gold under the right circumstances.

 

Side note: not to take anything away from ctj, but I wish scores had been pushed higher in 16. When I think of the most dominating San Antonio performance, it's flomo 16 hands down. Honorable mentions to Marcus 07/12 though

Agreed, a high number is cool and all, but winning every single subcaption? Pure domination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me personally there isn't "that one show" that is so good I expect a record to be broken. Honestly it makes it more fun because there are 4 or 5 bands I could see take gold under the right circumstances.

 

Side note: not to take anything away from ctj, but I wish scores had been pushed higher in 16. When I think of the most dominating San Antonio performance, it's flomo 16 hands down. Honorable mentions to Marcus 07/12 though

Agree. I'm more or less saying that the depth and spread of the talent this year will collectively drive the scores up; not thinking of any show in particular that will be a candidate for deserving an absolutely immense score at San Antonio.

 

To each his own. Of the three, I'd go with Marcus 12  :P

 

Also -- sans the Marcus/Woodlands 2012 visual tie, 2007/2012 shows swept captions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never believed higher scores to be based on quality of programs relative to the previous year, but rather a barometer of how judging works depending on where in the schedule the finalist caliber bands are. If there are top tier bands in the first block, even if they are destined to be one of the top few groups over the course of the 2 days of competition, the judge has to leave scoring room above them regardless. This early anticipation of potentially saving higher scores, results in lower top scores, since not many bands end up topping that group. But let's say, like last year, that a lot of the top bands aren't until the end, then you generally see a slow escalation of the top tier scores over the course of prelims, resulting in the scoring boom we saw in 2017. 6 of the top 10 scores from prelims last year came in the last 12 bands on Saturday. Finals scores then tend to generally reflect the prelims range.

 

I'm not sure how the top scores will be effected by the dual judging panels, but I imagine it will be somewhere between the average of the last 10 years, and the crazy burst from last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree. I'm more or less saying that the depth and spread of the talent this year will collectively drive the scores up; not thinking of any show in particular that will be a candidate for deserving an absolutely immense score at San Antonio.

 

To each his own. Of the three, I'd go with Marcus 12 :P

 

Also -- sans the Marcus/Woodlands 2012 visual tie, 2007/2012 shows swept captions

I'll never forget watching Marcus in 12 at SA and thinking a clarinet section feature was a mic'd soloist for about the first 8 seconds until I saw the whole section playing. My jaw immediately hit the floor.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never believed higher scores to be based on quality of programs relative to the previous year, but rather a barometer of how judging works depending on where in the schedule the finalist caliber bands are. If there are top tier bands in the first block, even if they are destined to be one of the top few groups over the course of the 2 days of competition, the judge has to leave scoring room above them regardless. This early anticipation of potentially saving higher scores, results in lower top scores, since not many bands end up topping that group. But let's say, like last year, that a lot of the top bands aren't until the end, then you generally see a slow escalation of the top tier scores over the course of prelims, resulting in the scoring boom we saw in 2017. 6 of the top 10 scores from prelims last year came in the last 12 bands on Saturday. Finals scores then tend to generally reflect the prelims range.

 

I'm not sure how the top scores will be effected by the dual judging panels, but I imagine it will be somewhere between the average of the last 10 years, and the crazy burst from last year.

 

An interesting interpretation of scoring that I've never considered before. That would provide an explanation of why 2017 was such an outlier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what you are saying is that that score for CTJ last year was a fluke and not truly earned.

WOW!!!- Really??? that is what you got from the conversation from the past week about scoring? that CTJ's score was somehow false and not earned?

 

I do more than my share of stating my personal comments, I own those and take my share of beatings for it, but it is directed at my disagreement with a post from an individual -  there is no place for slamming a program and as it appears you are new here and have stated the "Death of CTJ" and now questioning the validity of there 2017 win in San Antonio SR in the past 36 hours, I feel the need to call you on it.

 

I am hoping that your log in of NEBP does not stand for "North East Band Parent" because, as has been stated here on multiple occasions, regardless of the scores or placements, at the end of the day these kids from EVERY program put all they have on the field. Those same kids are on this site and should not be subjected to your type of response or comments that are hurtful to a program that they have put their all into, and that questions the values or accomplishments of their program.

 

Hype your program - GREAT - but don't slam others, every kid on the field is working their tail off  - that, my friend is a party foul. I will be in the dome this weekend and next week cheering for all the bands (even Reagan) and hope that you can find it in yourself to do the same.

 

#WHATABAND

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW!!!- Really??? that is what you got from the conversation from the past week about scoring? that CTJ's score was somehow false and not earned?

 

I do more than my share of stating my personal comments, I own those and take my share of beatings for it, but it is directed at my disagreement with a post from an individual - there is no place for slamming a program and as it appears you are new here and have stated the "Death of CTJ" and now questioning the validity of there 2017 win in San Antonio SR in the past 36 hours, I feel the need to call you on it.

 

I am hoping that your log in of NEBP does not stand for "North East Band Parent" because, as has been stated here on multiple occasions, regardless of the scores or placements, at the end of the day these kids from EVERY program put all they have on the field. Those same kids are on this site and should not be subjected to your type of response or comments that are hurtful to a program that they have put their all into, and that questions the values or accomplishments of their program.

 

Hype your program - GREAT - but don't slam others, every kid on the field is working their tail off - that, my friend is a party foul. I will be in the dome this weekend and next week cheering for all the bands (even Reagan) and hope that you can find it in yourself to do the same.

 

#WHATABAND

Someone was triggered. Aren't you the same person that said you didnt believe Cy-Fair deserved to be one of the top 30 bands in Texas or that Waxahachie was good enough to be on that list either? I see that as no different than a suggestion that CTJs score was inflated last year. Besides, it is pretty clear it was just trying to get a reaction anyways and it seems to have worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone was triggered. Aren't you the same person that said you didnt believe Cy-Fair deserved to be one of the top 30 bands in Texas or that Waxahachie was good enough to be on that list either? I see that as no different than a suggestion that CTJs score was inflated last year. Besides, it is pretty clear it was just trying to get a reaction anyways and it seems to have worked.

it is one thing to state in my opinion that a program did not fit into my projection because I have not seen those programs - we all have projections and not everyone will fit - nor is that degrading - it is another to degrade a program as "DEAD" or that their win in one of the largest events of the year was not earned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is one thing to state in my opinion that a program did not fit into my projection because I have not seen those programs - we all have projections and not everyone will fit - nor is that degrading - it is another to degrade a program as "DEAD" or that their win in one of the largest events of the year was not earned.

Wow... no one said their win was undeserved. They said the record score was a fluke. Even that isnt negative towards your program, just commenting on the way the contest played out. Maybe stop finding slights in what random people online say and focus on supporting your program in real life. Just my two cents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow... no one said their win was undeserved. They said the record score was a fluke. Even that isnt negative towards your program, just commenting on the way the contest played out. Maybe stop finding slights in what random people online say and focus on supporting your program in real life. Just my two cents.

below is the statement that the score was "not truly earned" - this was combined with statements that the program was DEAD in the area D feed. I currently have no kids in the program and can assure you that I support the program in real life

Nebp, on 29 Oct 2018 - 20:06, said:snapback.png

So what you are saying is that that score for CTJ last year was a fluke and not truly earned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...