Jump to content

The Danpodcast - Cherry On BOA Austin 2018


Recommended Posts

I love to see all the Texas bands keep getting better and better. BUT, I was so disappointed to hear, or rather be subjected to, the AWFUL use of microphones by a couple of the finalists. Not only does it give the message that the director of that band does not believe in its students abilities to perform, but it horrendously distorted the music and created a huge imbalance in the musical performance. And, it was VERY PAINFUL to the audience trying to enjoy the bands' performance.

 

BOA needs to set limits on the use of mic-ing to create a fair marching band experience for all the bands as well as the audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love to see all the Texas bands keep getting better and better. BUT, I was so disappointed to hear, or rather be subjected to, the AWFUL use of microphones by a couple of the finalists. Not only does it give the message that the director of that band does not believe in its students abilities to perform, but it horrendously distorted the music and created a huge imbalance in the musical performance. And, it was VERY PAINFUL to the audience trying to enjoy the bands' performance.

 

BOA needs to set limits on the use of mic-ing to create a fair marching band experience for all the bands as well as the audience.

this has been a growing trend for the past 3-4 years - not sure how it is unfair if everyone has the ability to use them but choose not to do so. I doubt this will change any time soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love to see all the Texas bands keep getting better and better. BUT, I was so disappointed to hear, or rather be subjected to, the AWFUL use of microphones by a couple of the finalists. Not only does it give the message that the director of that band does not believe in its students abilities to perform, but it horrendously distorted the music and created a huge imbalance in the musical performance. And, it was VERY PAINFUL to the audience trying to enjoy the bands' performance.

 

BOA needs to set limits on the use of mic-ing to create a fair marching band experience for all the bands as well as the audience.

 

The amount of mics used Saturday were crazy. I mean I like when it's used tastefully, but it can just get out of hand. Take Round Rock for example. A fantastic bari sax ensemble, but mics were so overpowering. It was distracting how loud they were. I'm a fan of advancement in band tech, but let's click it down a few notches.

 

While I'm talking about electronics, some synth yesterday was ridiculous.  My seat was literally shaking due to how loud the ""supporting"" electronics were. John Paul Stevens was a bad offender of this. They have a great and well-balanced sound, but synth at the hits made it sound so fake.

 

These things are both awesome if bands just used them with a little more discretion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

this has been a growing trend for the past 3-4 years - not sure how it is unfair if everyone has the ability to use them but choose not to do so. I doubt this will change any time soon.

Everyone does NOT have that ability. Top of the line equipment is expensive and adds even more advantage to affluent groups. I know it's a reality of the world some schools have more money than others, but we shouldn't let wealth dictate something for bands that isn't even necessary in the first place. If you want to play loud, learn how to play loud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mics and electronics are the paradigm. I don't see this changing. It's still early in the season and like all the other aspects of a show, the bugs are being worked out.

I feel that it is great that students are given the opportunity to learn these techniques. Managing a mixing board with multiple field mics, pit mics, solo mics, recordings and electronic instruments is a skill in and of itself. Kuddos to the mix masters and set up crews, for they too are part of the programs we see today.

It's up to the programs themselves to determine if this technology is used, it's complexity and what it brings to their particular show.

Remember too that these techniques (electronic/digital) can be an asset or detrimental to a show. When it's done right it can really enhance a movement, but a simple trip, faulty generator, wire or connection could kill that movement.

Either way it is what it is today and surely the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mics and electronics are the paradigm. I don't see this changing. It's still early in the season and like all the other aspects of a show, the bugs are being worked out.

I feel that it is great that students are given the opportunity to learn these techniques. Managing a mixing board with multiple field mics, pit mics, solo mics, recordings and electronic instruments is a skill in and of itself. Kuddos to the mix masters and set up crews, for they too are part of the programs we see today.

It's up to the programs themselves to determine if this technology is used, it's complexity and what it brings to their particular show.

Remember too that these techniques (electronic/digital) can be an asset or detrimental to a show. When it's done right it can really enhance a movement, but a simple trip, faulty generator, wire or connection could kill that movement.

Either way it is what it is today and surely the future.

 

See a lot of bands on Saturday. Quite a few bands had electronic failures (Cedar Park in prelims, Leander in finals). In Leander's case, they still made their way to second place. Relying to heavily on them could turn your show into a trainwreck when they fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

See a lot of bands on Saturday. Quite a few bands had electronic failures (Cedar Park in prelims, Leander in finals). In Leander's case, they still made their way to second place. Relying to heavily on them could turn your show into a trainwreck when they fail.

Yup. Electronic failure caused us to start too early and receive the penalty in 2015 that cost us the regional. It's frustrating as a performer to be heavily affected by something you have no control of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See a lot of bands on Saturday. Quite a few bands had electronic failures (Cedar Park in prelims, Leander in finals). In Leander's case, they still made their way to second place. Relying to heavily on them could turn your show into a trainwreck when they fail.

Yeah, the rain messed up our sound for prelims at Cap City, so it was a disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- Microphone all the things.  The possibilities are endless and can actually influence the visual design of the show since you don't have to have soloists in the front.

- There is/has always been an inherent risk with electronics in this activity.  Set up of electronics on the field, including cable organization, is practiced over and over again.

- If the balance of "shot-gunned" mics is off, the judges should absolutely account for that in the sheets/scoring.  These microphones are fairly new to a large number of groups so there is definitely some learning curve of how to adjust if programs are not balancing the sound properly.  DCI is struggling with the same situation.  How much do you "deduct" if amplification is not balanced?
- Common misconception is that Loud = All The Points.  The judges aren't looking for "loud".  They are looking for consistent, clear tone.  Amplification can really hurt your program if the repertoire cannot be played in tune.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love to see all the Texas bands keep getting better and better. BUT, I was so disappointed to hear, or rather be subjected to, the AWFUL use of microphones by a couple of the finalists. Not only does it give the message that the director of that band does not believe in its students abilities to perform, but it horrendously distorted the music and created a huge imbalance in the musical performance. And, it was VERY PAINFUL to the audience trying to enjoy the bands' performance.

 

BOA needs to set limits on the use of mic-ing to create a fair marching band experience for all the bands as well as the audience.

I don't remember hearing anything awful or painful in finals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To give credit where I think credit is due, I really thought that the performance of the mics was pretty good. Cedar Ridge had one shotgun mike and used it to great effect, and on the large part even the groups which straight up put 5 mikes on the front sideline (I’m looking at you Winston Churchill...) were still able to create a good mix of miced sound and real sound. So to be completely honest I was ok with the use of the mics. However I have heard much worse, expecially from DCI finalists who get this sound where you can here both the sound captured by the mics laid over the top of the corps and it sounds incredibly distracting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...