BugWub24 Posted December 16, 2025 Posted December 16, 2025 On 12/9/2025 at 3:22 PM, BugWub24 said: I have been in the process of making spreadsheets for conferences 4A through 6A, giving an outlook for this next cycle of realignment under the current area alignment. When the cutoff numbers are released, I will make some final adjustments and post the sheets here. Here are those spreadsheets! I tried to include as many schools as I knew that are opening in 2026 and 2027! If I missed any, feel free to shout at me 2026-2028 UIL Marching Band Realignment.xlsx lost 1 Quote
Toasty Posted December 16, 2025 Posted December 16, 2025 13 minutes ago, BugWub24 said: Here are those spreadsheets! I tried to include as many schools as I knew that are opening in 2026 and 2027! If I missed any, feel free to shout at me 2026-2028 UIL Marching Band Realignment.xlsx 194.06 kB · 1 download Is el dorado a region 2 5A school? You don’t have them listed as jumping up or coming down, have they always been there? Quote
BugWub24 Posted December 16, 2025 Posted December 16, 2025 1 minute ago, Toasty said: Is el dorado a region 2 5A school? You don’t have them listed as jumping up or coming down, have they always been there? Region 22, they've always been there. Quote
Toasty Posted December 16, 2025 Posted December 16, 2025 1 minute ago, BugWub24 said: Region 22, they've always been there. Ohhh sorry, 24 bands in 5A really sucks Quote
dullbanddad Posted December 16, 2025 Posted December 16, 2025 3 hours ago, RaElk99 said: Confirms all LISD bands (minus Glenn) will be 6A next year. LeanderMomma 1 Quote
TexasStrangers Posted December 16, 2025 Posted December 16, 2025 3 hours ago, BugWub24 said: Region 22, they've always been there. Would love to see you continue with 3A at least. I think there were 20 or so schools that dropped down to 3A Quote
TexasStrangers Posted December 16, 2025 Posted December 16, 2025 Any ideas of them redoing the Areas as well? I know last realignment some schools stayed in the same classification but got moved to another Area. Quote
Samuel Culper Posted December 17, 2025 Posted December 17, 2025 15 minutes ago, TexasStrangers said: Any ideas of them redoing the Areas as well? I know last realignment some schools stayed in the same classification but got moved to another Area. TMEA realignment will probably happen in the spring. Quote
BugWub24 Posted December 17, 2025 Posted December 17, 2025 3 hours ago, TexasStrangers said: Would love to see you continue with 3A at least. I think there were 20 or so schools that dropped down to 3A Shoutout to 3A Region 11 for all of their bands getting 1s this year lol EDIT: Smithville and Caldwell got 1s, I just didn't mark it as such 🤦🏻♂️ 3A 2026-28.xlsx TexasStrangers 1 Quote
imnewhere Posted December 17, 2025 Posted December 17, 2025 (edited) I know we’re the little guys, but for anyone curious about how 1A marching might shake out (since we advance straight to State): Bold programs earned a Division 1 rating this past year. Because advancement is tied to the number of Division 1 bands, Region 6 would be the only region with Division 1 bands left out. Everyone else either stays the same or becomes easier due to changes in participation (except Region 16, where the addition of Whiteface makes it harder for bands that did not earn a Division 1). I’m curious whether the upcoming TMEA realignment will change any of this, but probably not. It be like that XD *edit because I forgot Region 7 Region 1 Booker, Claude, Happy, White Deer Region 6 Baird, Bronte, Eden, Iraan, Irion, Menard, Rankin, Rotan, Water Valley Region 7 Knox City, Santa Anna Region 8 Coolidge Region 11 D'Hanis, Leakey, Nueces Canyon, Rocksprings Region 12 Runge Region 16 Crosbyton, Jayton, O'Donnell, Petersburg, Ralls, Springlake-Earth, Whiteface Edited December 17, 2025 by imnewhere forgot region 7 anotherbandmom 1 Quote
Cosmo Posted December 17, 2025 Posted December 17, 2025 Now that the realignment numbers are out, we are starting to get a picture of how 6A will look for the next two years. This is how some of the areas look now after reclassifying but before redistricting (will happen in the spring). This is for 6A: Dallas-Fort Worth Areas Area B lost: Cedar Hill, Mansfield Legacy Area B gained: Aledo, Granbury Area C lost: Lancaster, Rowlett, Garland, Mesquite, Area C gained: Red Oak Area J lost: Area J Gained: Frisco wakeland, Prosper Walnut Grove Quote
cajunman Posted December 17, 2025 Posted December 17, 2025 14 hours ago, BugWub24 said: Shoutout to 3A Region 11 for all of their bands getting 1s this year lol EDIT: Smithville and Caldwell got 1s, I just didn't mark it as such 🤦🏻♂️ 3A 2026-28.xlsx 50.08 kB · 8 downloads You are missing the Region 18/26 bands in Area D: Thrall, Columbus, Halletsville, Rockdale, Lexington, and Schulenberg. Quote
BugWub24 Posted December 18, 2025 Posted December 18, 2025 I have been playing around with creating a new alignment for the DFW areas, and man, I cannot find a good alternate to these two options: 1. Maintain the current alignment 2. Go back to the 2022-24 alignment In my honest opinion, the way it is currently set is really good geographically, and Area J will only get bigger as more people move up north. The only issue is that Area C isn't getting the same level of growth out east of Dallas. The only cities that have seen that growth out east are Forney and Crandall. This wouldn't be as huge of an issue if Garland ISD didn't have such crazy enrollment imbalance between the schools: North Garland - 2903 Sachse - 2866 (big gap) Garland - 2144 Lakeview Centennial - 2080 Rowlett - 2024 South Garland - 1915 Naaman Forest - 1822 (oh btw, for football, they have 5A-D2 numbers but will probably still play in 6A, make it make sense lol) Quote
crunchycookie3 Posted December 18, 2025 Posted December 18, 2025 I think it’s time to disband Area C to pad back up areas B and J Quote
TexasStrangers Posted December 18, 2025 Posted December 18, 2025 11 hours ago, BugWub24 said: I have been playing around with creating a new alignment for the DFW areas, and man, I cannot find a good alternate to these two options: 1. Maintain the current alignment 2. Go back to the 2022-24 alignment In my honest opinion, the way it is currently set is really good geographically, and Area J will only get bigger as more people move up north. The only issue is that Area C isn't getting the same level of growth out east of Dallas. The only cities that have seen that growth out east are Forney and Crandall. This wouldn't be as huge of an issue if Garland ISD didn't have such crazy enrollment imbalance between the schools: North Garland - 2903 Sachse - 2866 (big gap) Garland - 2144 Lakeview Centennial - 2080 Rowlett - 2024 South Garland - 1915 Naaman Forest - 1822 (oh btw, for football, they have 5A-D2 numbers but will probably still play in 6A, make it make sense lol) I think the reason why you are not seeing alot of school growth with Area C is because it is encumbered with 3A/2A bands that are all very close to each other. There really isn't alot of 4A/5A schools out East especially schools that are known for having a decent band program. I know numerous 3A/2A schools saw declines in enrollment with students going "home school", students going back to "mexico" and several schools have students jump back and forth between districts alot or accepting/denying transfers. BugWub24 1 Quote
dfwhorn Posted December 19, 2025 Author Posted December 19, 2025 23 hours ago, BugWub24 said: I have been playing around with creating a new alignment for the DFW areas, and man, I cannot find a good alternate to these two options: 1. Maintain the current alignment 2. Go back to the 2022-24 alignment In my honest opinion, the way it is currently set is really good geographically, and Area J will only get bigger as more people move up north. The only issue is that Area C isn't getting the same level of growth out east of Dallas. The only cities that have seen that growth out east are Forney and Crandall. This wouldn't be as huge of an issue if Garland ISD didn't have such crazy enrollment imbalance between the schools: North Garland - 2903 Sachse - 2866 (big gap) Garland - 2144 Lakeview Centennial - 2080 Rowlett - 2024 South Garland - 1915 Naaman Forest - 1822 (oh btw, for football, they have 5A-D2 numbers but will probably still play in 6A, make it make sense lol) Don't forget GISD has their open enrollment system, meaning anyone from any corner of the district could go to the other side. Someone in 635 Garland could go to Sachse, or someone from Rowlett could go to Lakeview, or really any possibly scenario like that. Leaves GISD in a bit of a pickle regarding enrollment, well not for football because they all opt up LOL but for other activities such as band where they don't opt up. BugWub24 1 Quote
TrenBS Posted December 19, 2025 Posted December 19, 2025 16 hours ago, crunchycookie3 said: I think it’s time to disband Area C to pad back up areas B and J Made this for fun, just splitting J and balancing the two WanderingTraveler 1 Quote
BugWub24 Posted December 19, 2025 Posted December 19, 2025 15 hours ago, dfwhorn said: Don't forget GISD has their open enrollment system, meaning anyone from any corner of the district could go to the other side. Someone in 635 Garland could go to Sachse, or someone from Rowlett could go to Lakeview, or really any possibly scenario like that. Leaves GISD in a bit of a pickle regarding enrollment, well not for football because they all opt up LOL but for other activities such as band where they don't opt up. I remember back when all of these schools besides South Garland and Naaman were all safe 6A. Since then, North and Sachse have stayed around the same, while everyone else has declined pretty significantly. I don't know if consolidation will ever become a thing for GISD high schools, although it's already in motion with some of the elementary schools. Quote
lost Posted December 21, 2025 Posted December 21, 2025 On 12/16/2025 at 2:21 PM, BugWub24 said: Here are those spreadsheets! I tried to include as many schools as I knew that are opening in 2026 and 2027! If I missed any, feel free to shout at me 2026-2028 UIL Marching Band Realignment.xlsx 194.06 kB · 96 downloads Really well done! As is tradition area d gets a little bit harder with the addition of a few area finals bubble bands, because of course it does. Tubalord11 and BugWub24 2 Quote
BugWub24 Posted December 22, 2025 Posted December 22, 2025 8 hours ago, lost said: Really well done! As is tradition area d gets a little bit harder with the addition of a few area finals bubble bands, because of course it does. This is how I see 5A potentially balancing things back up. Six bands are dropping down to 5A Area E and it would now be way overcrowded. I could see College Station ISD and Rudder going back to Area D with the rest of Region 8 - this would maintain 5 state slots in Area D. In return, Victoria ISD goes to Area H. And I think it makes sense to keep Laredo ISD in Area G, as that is the designated South Texas/RGV area for 5A/6A. Smithson Valley almost wins in this situation. All of their main competition for 5th Place moved up, but A&M Cons. and College Station moving in would keep things interesting. Tubalord11 and DogefromSA 2 Quote
crunchycookie3 Posted December 22, 2025 Posted December 22, 2025 It’s early but the realignment map is updated! No big changes as far as I can see in 6A. Edit: A lot of the enrollment data isn’t accurate (like Wakeland as 5A etc.) so this is likely not official yet. BugWub24 1 Quote
BugWub24 Posted December 22, 2025 Posted December 22, 2025 2 hours ago, crunchycookie3 said: It’s early but the realignment map is updated! No big changes as far as I can see in 6A. Edit: A lot of the enrollment data isn’t accurate (like Wakeland as 5A etc.) so this is likely not official yet. The dropdown menus haven't been changed yet, but all of the data is accurate. If you click the Frisco ISD page open, Wakeland is listed as a 6A. Something interesting to note on this same topic: all of the Garland ISD schools are marked as 6A. Are we introducing opt-ups for band??? lol Quote
dfwhorn Posted December 22, 2025 Author Posted December 22, 2025 3 hours ago, crunchycookie3 said: It’s early but the realignment map is updated! No big changes as far as I can see in 6A. Edit: A lot of the enrollment data isn’t accurate (like Wakeland as 5A etc.) so this is likely not official yet. I think more things will chance, this still feels a lot like 2024. Id expect more things closer to Feburary-ish when they release the districts for athletics. I have a feeling something will chance, possibly in 2/24/25 region wise. Will probably be something simple like swapping a few ISDs around with eachother for balance Quote
TrenBS Posted December 23, 2025 Posted December 23, 2025 On 12/22/2025 at 1:04 PM, dfwhorn said: I think more things will chance, this still feels a lot like 2024. Id expect more things closer to Feburary-ish when they release the districts for athletics. I have a feeling something will chance, possibly in 2/24/25 region wise. Will probably be something simple like swapping a few ISDs around with eachother for balance Its just the 2024 map right now, and I expect J to get split to B and C with 24 to B and 2/25 to C. If not, then UIL is likely making a major rule change that will affect how area functions since H and J are downright horrible at the moment and B/C are starting to lag behind some of the other areas with the high state bubble JazzRun 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.