I want to take a step back and look at this from a completely subjective point of view. Do I believe there are some strange results here tonight, sure…However I think we are trying to make sense of too many loose variables. Let’s start with the obvious….trying to translate BOA to UIL. While scoring positively in BOA can be an indicator of success, it CANNOT be the only value used. GE is not a concept at the UIL level, which is a primary driver of why some bands can flip flop across contests. Secondly, we have to realize that run-per-run basis exists, and is exactly what is being judged. This isn’t the prediction game that some of us do that takes everything into account. This is ‘what did the band do on the field, right here and now’. Some bands have had successful seasons and didn’t have their best run, and vise versa…All in all, just because a band should beat someone, doesn’t mean they will.
I’ll go top to bottom here with my thoughts. Cedar Park unanimously first, followed by Rouse…No issues here. Wakeland, especially from the UIL perspective, incredibly clean. Argyle, historically has been very precise and clean. They were like the 4A Hebron for a while in the way they approached the game and it’s paying off as they grow in number. Love it or hate it, this is the formula for success for these judging sheets. Leander got nuked in content and design, and I think this might be this first thing on the sheets that raise an eyebrow. All other scores make sense. LT under Argyle, after beating them outright at area, I would say yes in terms of todays run. Without getting to specific, especially musically, not LTs best run, despite their successful season. Aledo under Argyle doesnt surprise me after my commentary post-BOA. BC, great band, legendary percussion, content score was weird. Lone Star…had a bad run. I have seen this band a few times this season and this was off. However, do I think it was 9th? No. I have no doubt this could move up tomorrow. Top 5 show/band, maybe not top 5 run. Mentioned in my prelims comments that Richland had a good run and got rewarded for it! I think this fits perfectly. After this point I think the bubble becomes very strong, but heres a few notes: Poteet from a UIL perspective, very clean couldve made it in here. Lake Belton/Friendswood, two bands I predicted to make finals, just on the outside looking in from some great runs from the bubble bands that made it. I still personally would have taken Frindswood, but thats a one judge perspective. Again, tons of other bubble bands I commented on like Hendrickson, Roma, A&M Consolidated(I wouldve placed in finals), and the surprise of the day Harlingen South…but it is so complicated to place these bands near the bubble because of how competitive it is in 5A. Last comment I will make is regarding Midlothian. This was in my top 12 that I predicted. They had great season, but the run didn’t give them any brownie points. They had an incredible season, and they have a great production this year, that was super entertaining, but it fell short in prelims, and thats that.
Again, this is prelims, and a lot could shift. Its more about getting the correct bands to finals. There is some funky stuff going on, sure, but also realize the game you are playing with the sheets. Which might be a reason Hebron didn’t win a state championship this year.
This was a fairly blunt recap, but blaming judges outright is just lame IMO.