Of course, I was making massive generalizations and exaggerating to make a point, and I don't mean to apply them to every individual case. And I certainly didn't mean to antagonize anyone. I know my cousin is in a class of less than 100 and is Valedictorian, and I would never stretch to say that she got that position without working hard. Nor would I say that the competition for top 10% and top rankings is any less fierce in some areas than others.
As for my school....To be in the top 10%, you have to have a 4.48 or higher (We grade on a 4.5 scale). I don't think it's necessarily easier anywhere. I was simply saying, someone in the top ten percent at some school may have worked less hard than someone else who wasn't in the top ten percent, and thus gets automatic admission to a big name Texas school, whereas the person who might have deserved it more doesn't. It works both ways, too. Like you said, more people in bigger schools get admitted, so someone could have made into the top ten as number fifty nine out of sixty while another kid from a smaller school was number sixteen out of the fifteen that makes up the top ten percent.
And that, unfortunately, is why we need standardized testing. I just wish it didn't suck so hard. This wasn't supposed to be an argument, it was supposed to prove a point.