Jump to content

What groups should drop out of UIL?


Recommended Posts

Besides all of them. Or (if you're crazy) none of them. What are the ones that would benefit the most?

 

I was going back through some old threads and saw that rumor from a couple of years ago about how Claudia Taylor Johnson had supposedly dropped out of UIL. It ended up being false, but it got me thinking: what if they had? Also, I'm probably thinking about it more these days because Avon is coming down to SA this year and stands a very good chance of making mincemeat out of the Texas groups in the visual captions (as usual). Like last season, I probably won't comment on any of the shows, but going into this season, Avon would be my guess for SA Champion. (It'll be like Carmel 2002 all over again, but this time around it won't be the result of one judge tanking L.D. Bell in Visual GE in finals, and it'll be at a *~*SUPER*~* Regional.) Just imagine if the playing field were level. Everyone could do so much more. But who would do the most?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose you mean scoring benefits -- from attending BOA events instead. That seems to go knee-deep into UIL v. BOA scoring differences. Otherwise I would say -- well, the eight hour rule is gone. Work those kids like slaves! Five lashings for being out of step! Bread, water, and tears for a week! And who couldn't benefit from that? (I jest.)

 

Some time ago I made a silly, several-hundred word post on scoring rubrics in general. I think I still hold basically the same view though. The rubrics aren't on the paper, so to speak. They're somewhere out there in the minds of judges and directors. That's because the ink on the page is vague, and vague things admit a range of interpretation. The contest circuit simply selects which range they think is legitimate by selecting the judges they like. I'd like to trust the contest circuits, so think the judges and their range of interpretation generally ends up being legitimate. If that's true though, there's not really a scientific way of precisely determining the differences between the UIL/BOA scoring systems. That's because the systems are not really determined by the ink on the page or set in stone to begin with. Schrodinger's rubric sheet, if you like.

 

Your best bet would be to go out and harass -- I mean, interview -- each judge/director at length and nail things down as best as possible. All while hoping nothing important changes for the rest of the season. Then apply your findings to the way you expect certain groups will perform. At best, our predictions are vague and intuitive. Which is clearly not acceptable on Txbands. (But, in all seriousness, my point is that if discussion did head in that direction, I'm not sure it could ever be remotely conclusive. Even in principle.)

 

I agree with principalagent's third claim about San Antonio. Texas indeed has developed an interesting "depth" of high-quality groups over the past decade. (In fact, if we reflect upon it, that seems about right. The activity is young. We might well expect a good deal of flux.) I do think it's reasonable to suggest that Avon could come out on top, but only just about as reasonable as saying any other high-caliber group would come out on top. Until we have more info, probably Texas is a better bet.

Edited by Anthony V
Link to comment
Share on other sites

principalagent - I agree entirely with the first paragraph. In the second paragraph, I don't agree that there has been a band in Texas every year since 2010 that could beat Avon. 2013, yes, obviously. 2016, maybe, although Avon was stronger visually. Other years, I'm not so certain. Certainly, it's not obvious enough that I would use the word, "likely." I do, however, agree with the last claim. The probability of Texas band X or Y or Z beating Avon is additive, and therefore probably higher overall, although Avon is VERY dominant. By the way, although I knew it would strike a nerve, my main reason for bringing this up wasn't to get into a debate over whether or not Avon will win SA.

 

aaron067 - I'm not really discounting UIL here, although it's no secret I'm not a big fan. I'm just fantasizing about the removal of the 8-hour rule, which happens pretty regularly on these forums. By the way, I agree that Texas has the deepest field of bands in the nation. I think most music educators would agree with that, even the ones who don't teach in Texas.

 

Anthony V - Eh, I don't really view this as a UIL scoring versus BOA scoring thread. Indeed, if the 8-hour rule were dropped, you'd see improvements by bands in both circuits. As such, I don't think the second paragraph, in which you describe how rubrics are internalized by judges and therefore difficult to truly distinguish, is really germane to the discussion. As for the third paragraph, I'm not completely sure to what you are referring. Do you mean that if I wanted to know how groups would change without the 8-hour rule I might start conducting interviews? Well, maybe, but this is all speculative. It is a thread on TXBands, after all.

 

BandG33k73 and JeremiahW - Maybe, unless they end up getting a prelims panel like they did in 2015 at SA, when they placed 3rd. Or a prelims panel like they did in 2016 at SA, when they placed third in Effect and had several groups scoring within a point of them. Obviously, they're fabulous and more than capable of winning an Eagle, but there's a little less agreement about their dominance than some folks would have you believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anything were to change, I see it being as simple as changing the band version of the 8-hour rule to what the other fine arts and athletic groups benefit from: 8 hours from the beginning of school on Monday through the end of school on Friday.  Weekends are a free-for-all.  That being said, I believe athletics has several weighty stipulations when it comes to actual practice vs. workout time vs. group gathering (such as watching videos), and Lord knows most theater programs don't seem to abide completely by their 8 hour rule (or they find "loopholes").

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe, unless they end up getting a prelims panel like they did in 2015 at SA, when they placed 3rd. Or a prelims panel like they did in 2016 at SA, when they placed third in Effect and had several groups scoring within a point of them. Obviously, they're fabulous and more than capable of winning an Eagle, but there's a little less agreement about their dominance than some folks would have you believe.

 

Prelims panels are inherently imperfect, especially at San Antonio where they're judging 64 bands spread across two days. Even if they were third going into semis at Grand Nats these past two years, I'm sure they would have won semis and finals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We also shouldn't completely rule out the idea that the UIL Marching Band 8-Hour Rule has likely been a long-term benefit for TX bands (and bands across the country) as TX directors have had to heavily focus on their pedagogy skills and methods in order to optimize what they can get out of those 8 hours.

 

8 hours a week of smart teaching is certainly more effective than unlimited just rehearsing without a strategic game plan.  I'm certainly not accusing someone like Avon of not rehearsing effectively (look at who teaches them), but I'm finding out first hand how you have to plan every single thing you do so strategically to fit into those 8 hours even just in concert season, I can only imagine it's worse in marching season.  You certainly over the years learn how to become an incredibly efficient director and teacher because of it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I understand, part of the 8-hour rule comes from STATE LAW (through TEA), not just UIL. As far as I know, UIL only lets marching bands have 8 hours all week, while TEA mandates 8 hours from Mon-Fri (leaving weekends wide open.) But then, no more UIL competitions for a full cycle- aka two years. So let's look at potential upsides/downsides.

 

Upsides:

-Free weekend hours (big for working visual packages)

-No strange UIL judging/regulations (aka shows longer than the 8-minute cap!!!!!)

-"UIL heavy hitters" are free to explore some cooler/less traditional options (although the huge disparity of super-traditional UIL vs "modern" BOA is slowly falling away IMO)

-Makes BOA SA/BOA GN more reasonable especially with the crazy schedule of 2016 (see: CTJ)

 

Downsides:

-Lose out on free contests/chances to run show in contest setting (Region, Area... even State)

-No more UIL Region, UIL Concert, or TMEA Honor Band (I think... someone might need to fact check that) for TWO YEARS!

-lose some state-wide reputation that UIL brings

 

Honestly it's hard to tell whether it's worth it. There are a few bands that I can think that could possibly benefit from dropping UIL... but honestly, provided that memory serves correct, idk if that extra weekend block is even worth it as you still are limited to the 8-hours during the school week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that the 8 hour rule has forced directors to use their rehearsal time more effectively. That said, I'm not convinced they'd stop using their time effectively if they could tack on occasional Saturday rehearsals. It would take at least a generation or two for them to get lazy and complacent, right? ;)

 

For the random Flower Mound tiff: I agree that prelims panels aren't the most accurate, but FM *did* perform last last year. And in 2015, Reagan performed before them and placed 2nd. So, those results probably weren't entirely due to the overwhelming number of high quality bands. By the way, I think FM would have won last year (not 2015, though). Just one caveat: if Broken Arrow had also gone last year, they would have won. Their show was a near-masterpiece, and I don't say that lightly. But, it's all hypothetical, isn't it?

 

1,000 likes for Brandon's post. Yes, and yes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a band were to drop out of UIL, would that mean the whole school would? IE The orchestra or theatre can't go to UIL competitions either?

 

A few years ago, I asked UIL director of music Bradley Kent about this. He said that because schools are members of UIL, not individual sports teams or bands, an entire school would have to withdraw from UIL competition. There might be a way to claim that an "outdoor performance ensemble" is not a marching band and is an extracurricular activity other than band that just so happens to compete in other non-UIL band events, but that logic seems unlikely to work.

 

TLDR: Never gonna happen because Texas + Football

Edited by JeremiahW
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that a recent change? Because Westfield regularly made deep runs into UIL playoffs in football around the same time that their band completely pulled out of UIL. I know the band created their own district Solo and Ensemble (for Spring as well), but I was under the impression that the rest of the school stuck to UIL.

 

To clarify, he said a band can choose to compete or not compete in UIL-sanctioned competitions without a school pulling out of UIL, but the band would still have to follow the 8-hour rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To clarify, he said a band can choose to compete or not compete in UIL-sanctioned competitions without a school pulling out of UIL, but the band would still have to follow the 8-hour rule.

 

From my understanding he's referring to 2003 when Westfield's band withdrew from UIL specifically so they wouldn't have to follow the 8 hour rule, as opposed to CTJ just choosing not to attend UIL events, while still abiding by the UIL 8-hour rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An extra 3 or 4 hours of rehearsal each week can make a huge difference if the time is used wisely, especially if it's done on a Saturday. Saturday rehearsals are a completely different animal without the school day interferences and when the whole band and the directors are in a different frame of mind. Even a highly focused 2-hour rehearsal then can reap great rewards and much cleaning and tweaking can be done. It also gives you a chance to fix something you weren't happy with on Friday night and not have to wait until Monday or Tuesday to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...